Don’t Like a Prospective Tenant’s Appearance?
Monday, October 12th, 2009Is it Legal to Reject?
If you’re a landlord, you must stay current on federal, state, and local laws that cover access to fair and equal housing. The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination against tenants based on race, religion, marital or family status, color, national origin, sex or disability. Many states also prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation.
But what about the tenant applicants who dress or present themselves in a manner you consider inappropriate? Certainly everything is subjective—some folks can’t have enough tattoos and others can’t stand them. But what the FHA and your local/state government considers discrimination is anything but subjective. You cannot reject an applicant for rental housing if they fall within any protected group.
So are body piercings, loose or revealing clothing, tattoos, and other personal appearance choices considered protected? No. A landlord may reject a tenant for any reason—including clothing choices and body adornments—other than those listed by the FHA and your local and state laws.
Landlords should be cautious, however: if you are rejecting tenant applicants based solely on their appearance, and they are also of a protected class, you could be asking for an accusation of discrimination.
When faced with an applicant whose appearance you just don’t like, but who passes your entire tenant screening process with flying colors, you may just have to adjust your concept of what is acceptable—especially in this market. You might just be surprised that, despite your preconceived notions, the tatted, pierced young person before you is your most pleasant and responsible tenant ever!